Gossip is the only sound that travels faster than sound.
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ||||||
| 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
| 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 |
| 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 |
Joan Zuckerberg: Difficult Questions Kids Ask and Are Afraid to Ask About Divorce
Richard A. Warshak: Divorce Poison: Protecting the Parent-Child Bond from a Vindictive Ex
Judith S. Wallerstein: What About the Kids? Raising Your Children Before, During, and After Divorce
William L. Coleman: What Children Need to Know When Parents Get Divorced
Gossip is the only sound that travels faster than sound.
Posted by Mike Mastracci on Saturday, December 01, 2007 in Quotes and Inspiration | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
I hear them briefly through thin wire.
Their smell is gone from the pillowcases.
A visit this weekend will provide another snapshot, a touch
Will we ever share the same ground?
When will I ever be allowed to tell them stories over campfires of past warriors?
O great spirit, give me strength to keep trying, for I love them so.
Anyone who doesn't understand the pain divorce causes fathers has only to read this desperate plea by Douglas MacKay, a divorced father of three in Connecticut. I ran across this prayer in The Divorced Dad's Survival Book: How to Stay Connected with Your Kids by David Knox with Kermit Leggett.
With more than half the marriages in America ending in divorce, the number of single-parent homes is increasing. Of the more than 20 million children who live in single-parent homes, 85% live with their mother. Since courts traditionally award custody to mothers, many of these children see their fathers only a few times a month, if at all. After divorce, the amount of time dads get to spend with their children plummets from 100% to less than 25%.
"The percentage of American children living apart from their biological fathers will reach 50% in the next century," predicts Rutgers University sociologist David Popenoe. "Think about it. Half of all children without fathers to say good night to them. Many, when asked who their father is, will answer, 'I don't have one.'"
What is this doing to America's children? We'll talk about that next time.
Posted by Mike Mastracci on Monday, November 12, 2007 in Child Access Issues | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Divorce coaches are important members of the professional team that assists divorcing spouses in a collaborative divorce. Each spouse retains his/her own divorce coach. The primary role of a divorce coach is to help each spouse deal with the emotional impact of divorce in a positive and effective way.
Mental health professionals with specialized training in collaborative law, divorce coaches help their clients refocus emotion-based thinking so they can make effective decisions and set positive goals that will benefit the entire family, particularly the children, both during and after divorce. Unlike a therapist who works to uncover the source of a problem, the divorce coach is a problem solver who empowers you to act.
Fear, anger and a desire for retribution or revenge are normal emotions when a couple divorces. Unfortunately, out-of-control emotions create huge stumbling blocks to resolving divorce and child custody issues. A divorce coach can help you understand, accept and refocus your emotions into a positive plan of action.
Generally, each spouse meets with his/her divorce coach separately before and/or after collaborative team meetings. Coaches may also accompany their clients to team meetings. A divorce coach can help you:
A divorce coach can help you develop effective communication, negotiation and problem-solving skills that can help you in future communications with your spouse and can be invaluable as you parent your children after divorce.
Posted by Mike Mastracci on Saturday, November 10, 2007 in Alternatives to Litigation, Collaborative Family Law, Communicating with Your Ex | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack (0)
There is life after divorce, despite how you may feel now. While you're in the throes of divorce so many aspects of your life are changing that you go into survival mode. Just getting through each day may seem to be all you can handle. Life does go on, however, and it's necessary -- and possible -- to move from survive to thrive, says relationship coach Laurie Cameron. Here are her 9 secrets to living happily after divorce:
Posted by Mike Mastracci on Thursday, November 08, 2007 in Healing From Divorce | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)
When you and your spouse decided to have a child, it was most likely a joyful time. From the moment of birth (and even before that), children steal your heart. You love them, care for them and protect them. You dedicate yourself to keeping your child safe, healthy and happy. Divorce shouldn't change that.
When divorce becomes a battlefield, your children are the casualties. During divorce, parents must put aside their anger and emotions when making decisions about their children's custody and support. They must separate their adult differences from the needs and welfare of their children and work together to make decisions that will support and provide for their children's physical and emotional well-being. Therapist Rosalind Sedacca calls this child-centered divorce.
"When you create a child-centered divorce, your children win -- on every level. Parents who make a concerted effort to sit down with each other and discuss the future well-being of their kids together, keep their perspective where it really belongs -- on the children," says Sedacca in a recent article on the website Child-Centered Divorce. (Click here to read the entire article.)
Sedacca suggests divorcing parents ask themselves the following questions:
These are not easy questions to answer. You and your spouse may need the help and support of counselors, divorce coaches and child advisers, in addition to your attorneys, to arrive at answers that support your children. If you and your spouse want to create a child-centered divorce, you should seriously consider consulting a collaborative family law attorney like myself. A collaborative divorce provides the supportive atmosphere and cooperative process necessary to help parents make decisions about their divorce that will benefit the entire family, particularly their children. Click here to find out more about collaborative divorce.
Posted by Mike Mastracci on Monday, November 05, 2007 in Child Access Issues, Child Support, Collaborative Family Law, Custody Scheduling, Mediation Issues | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
A divorced mother herself, therapist Rosalind Sedacca, has created an excellent new website, Child-Centered Divorce, that I can highly recommend. Built on her own struggles guiding her children through divorce, Sedacca has created a website that can be a valuable resource for parents striving to help their children cope with divorce.
The goal of the website is to provide parents with a support network that addresses the problems parents face with their children during divorce. Articles address the issues concerning the emotional health and welfare of children going through divorce. Parents will find the articles engagingly written and particularly useful. In each article parents will find new understandings and helpful tips they can apply to their own circumstances.
Sedacca shares her highly qualified experience in regular articles on the website and also draws on the knowledge and experience of a variety of experts. Some recent topics include:
Child-Centered Divorce was created this summer by Rosalind Sedacca, a Certified Corporate Trainer, author, national speaker and workshop facilitator. She is the author of the helpful new book How Do I Tell the Kids about the Divorce? A Create-a-Storybook Guide to Preparing Your Children - with Love! (see our October 29 post for a review).
Posted by Mike Mastracci on Friday, November 02, 2007 in Child Access Issues, Child Support, Child's Attorney, Custody Scheduling, Custody Standards, Parent Coordinators, Positive Parenting, Website of the Month | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
"When I was younger I could remember anything, whether it happened or not." ~ Mark Twain
Posted by Mike Mastracci on Thursday, November 01, 2007 in Quotes and Inspiration | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Having the "divorce talk" with their children is one of hardest things a parent has to do when they decide to divorce. In our last post we talked about some of the important messages you need to give your children. But how you talk to your children is equally important.
Most families move through the day at breakneck speed. In the morning everyone is rushing about to brush teeth, grab breakfast, pack lunches, let the dog out, find homework and get out the door to work and school. After school it's another rush from soccer practice to piano lesson to gymnastics to scouts; the carpool dash often running well past the dinner hour. The evening is filled with homework, dishes, laundry, baths, storytime and -- finally -- bed. And the next morning it starts all over again!
It's not too surprising then that we rarely seem to have time for quiet conversations with our children. "Too often busy parents find themselves talking at their children, but not to them. And most especially, not with them," says therapist Rosalind Sedacca in a post on the website Child-Centered Divorce. (Click the link to read her article.)
In any family setting this can be a challenge, but when your family is struggling through a divorce, the ability to talk to and with your children is essential. Here are some important things to remember when you talk to your children about your divorce:
Unsure of how to start a dialog with your child: Sedacca has some excellent advice: "Share some of your own feelings and experiences with life’s challenges before you start asking them [your children] questions about their life. Knowing that you personally deal with fears, anxieties, doubts and related emotions gives your children permission to talk about those they are experiencing. It makes them feel more okay about their own insecurities. And it encourages them to talk more frankly with you about challenges they face in all facets of their life." Good advice for parents, whether you're going through a divorce or not.
Posted by Mike Mastracci on Wednesday, October 31, 2007 in Positive Parenting | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)
Telling your children you've decided to get divorced is a difficult task. It's hard to find the right words to say and even harder not to let your own anger, hurt, fear and disappointment color your words. But how you tell your children that mom and dad won't be living together anymore can make a significant difference in their own ability to accept and adjust to the divorce.
How Do I Tell the Kids About the Divorce? A Create-a-Storybook Guide to Preparing Your Children - with Love! is an innovative aid developed to help parents talk to their children about divorce. Developed by therapist Rosalind Sedacca, CCT, after divorce forced her to have this conversation with her own children, the book guides parents in creating a personalized photo album-style book to use when they talk to their children about their divorce.
Fill-in-the-blank templates for creating a personalized story with age-appropriate text are provided with Sedacca's informative book for parents, How Do I Tell the Kids about the Divorce? The book answers parents' questions and helps them find the appropriate words to say to their children.
Sedacca says the six essential messages you must give your children when you tell them you are getting divorced are:
How Do I Tell the Kids about the Divorce? is a valuable guidebook for parents. This book will help you find the right words to use when talking to your children about your divorce. I recommend it. For more information on How Do I Tell the Kids about the Divorce? by Rosalind Sedacca and the companion Create-a-Story guide, click here.
Posted by Mike Mastracci on Monday, October 29, 2007 in Positive Parenting, References, Resources & Books | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Divorce and financial stress seem to go hand-in-hand. Despite new laws enacted in 2005 that tightened the requirements for bankruptcy, many people still see it as an easy way out of crushing financial debt. Unfortunately, some spouses also believe bankruptcy will allow them to escape their spousal or child support obligations during and/or after divorce.
The 2005 Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act closed most of the loopholes that used to affect the unfair discharge of family obligations. Debtors seeking protection under bankruptcy laws must now meet a means test tied to income and debt which limits their filing choices. (Click here for a rundown on the various types of bankruptcy and how the process works.) Today, it is extremely difficult for debtors to evade their spousal and family responsibilities. Under the 2005 act, domestic support obligations cannot be discharged and must be considered a first priority claim.
There are still opportunities for abuse, however; and the prudent person will seek legal counsel if their spouse or ex files for bankruptcy. For example, secured debt receives precedence in bankruptcy proceedings, after which there may not be enough money left to fully pay non-secured debts, even first priority claims. And while a bankruptcy stay (period of time during which creditors cannot act against the debtor) no longer applies to support, domestic violence and custody matters, it does delay the distribution of property and assets.
Despite protections provided under the new 2005 act, if your spouse or ex files for bankruptcy, you should seek legal counsel to protect your rights as a creditor. You should obtain copies of your spouse's bankruptcy schedules which disclose income, property, etc. Your attorney may need to file adversary complaints or proofs of claims to protect your interests. Under one bankruptcy plan, a debtor can still escape paying accumulated support arrears. If bankruptcy proceedings impact your divorce, it is important to consult an attorney to protect your interests and those of your children.
Marlene Browne, author of Boomer's Guide to Divorce and The Divorce Process: Empowerment Through Knowledge has written an interesting article on the changes in bankruptcy law. To read the article on Forbes.com, click here.
Posted by Mike Mastracci on Saturday, October 27, 2007 in Financial Costs and Issues | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Abuse is a powerful word. Domestic violence is a serious issue and growing concern in our country (see our previous two posts). Yet there is the temptation to misuse "the abuse card" in child custody cases. When domestic violence laws were enacted, lawmakers didn't expect parents to claim abuse or exaggerate abusive behaviors to "punish" their spouse and gain exclusive custody of their children, but that is what happens too often in family court.
It's easy to understand given the hurt, anger and volatile emotions generated during divorce. Even though not physically abused, one party may feel emotionally bereft and characterize this as abuse. It's a fine line easily crossed and fed by anger and guilt. Our adversarial approach to divorce doesn't help matters. Too often attorneys set on fixing blame and gaining the best settlement possible for their client will fan the flames, declaring certain behaviors abusive that in less emotional settings might be seen in a less volatile light. Not only do such actions undermine the safety of those who truly need protection under the domestic violence laws, but they are unfair to your children.
Domestic violence laws should not be used as a quick method for resolving child custody disputes. These laws are not there to provide one parent with a tactical advantage over the other. Parents who attempt to abuse these laws are not acting in their children's best interests and may find themselves at a disadvantage with the court.
If such allegations are deemed to be unfounded or grossly or intentionally exaggerated, a skilled attorney will easily be able to show that the accusatory parent, if he or she were awarded custody, would in all likelihood attempt to alienate the children from the other parent. In determining the best interests of the children with respect to custody and visitation, one of the important factors that the judge considers is which parent will better promote normal family relations. Children are entitled to the benefit of both sides of their family, including grandparents, aunts, uncles and cousins. Judges realize the importance of the support provided by the extended family and are generally unwilling to deny this to the children simply by virtue of a custody decision.
It is important to realize that animosity between a divorcing husband and wife most often does not extend to their children. The reasons for a failed marriage have everything to do with the dynamics of the spousal relationship, but little to do with a person's ability to be a kind, caring and loving parent. False or grossly exaggerated claims of abuse leave deep scars that will affect the entire family for years to come. They do nothing to promote future trust or the cooperative attitude necessary to effectively parent and raise your children after the divorce. They deny your children the support and comfort of one of the two most important people in their lives. Care should be taken to report instances of abuse or domestic violence in a factually accurate manner. The "abuse card" should not be played to punish your spouse out of hurt or anger. In the end, the ones you hurt most will be your children.
For more information on divorce, domestic violence and child custody, click here to visit my website.
Posted by Mike Mastracci on Wednesday, October 24, 2007 in Abuse Issues, Child Access Issues | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Every 15 seconds a woman is beaten in a domestic dispute somewhere in the U.S. according to the National Coalition Against Domestic Violence. That's four broken noses every minute, 240 cracked ribs every hour, 5760 bruised and battered women every day. For many, the only way to end the cycle of abuse is to divorce the abusive spouse and try to make a new life.
Too often battered women are afraid to leave their spouse or partner. They fear for themselves and for their children. They are so beaten down that they no longer have the emotional stamina to escape. (I realize that sometimes women are the abusers; but far more often it is the physically dominant male who inflicts the damage.) If you know someone who is in an abusive relationship, help them get the help they need right now, today.
Whether you are married or not, legal protection and prosecution are available to help you if you are being abused. On my website, I provide a step-by-step plan of action: what you need to do if you are being physically abused. Click here to find out what you should do and what you can expect from the police and the court system. There are also many agencies in Maryland that are dedicated to helping abused and battered women and their families. Click here for a list of domestic violence resources.
Not everyone will choose to divorce an abusive spouse, but every woman who is the subject of domestic violence should take steps to protect herself. If the abuse is triggered by alcohol or drug addiction, there is some chance that treating the addiction may end the abuse; however this can take months or even years.
Before you make a decision about the future of your marriage or relationship, you must first make sure that you and your children are safe. Get out, get away, get somewhere safe and take advantage of every legal protection available. Once you are safe, you can decide about the future.
Next time: When parents play the abuse card to win custody.
Posted by Mike Mastracci on Monday, October 22, 2007 in Abuse Issues | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Whitney Houston was on top of the world. With her powerful voice and tremendous vocal range, the Grammy winner's songs played at the top of the charts. She was in demand as a singer, actress and model. Then she married Bobby Brown in 1992 and her life started to unravel.
Their marriage was volatile; charges of infidelity, sexual misconduct, anorexia, drug abuse and spousal battery didn't take long to surface. For years Houston practically disappeared from public view, her name surfacing occasionally in lurid tabloid headlines. Her reputation and career in tatters, Houston finally entered a drub rehab program in 2004 and again in 2005, this time successfully. Finally, in late 2006 Houston divorced Brown, gained sole custody of their teenage daughter and started to piece her career back together. Looking healthy and vivacious, Houston has made a few non-singing appearances this year and a new record is in the works. "The Voice" is back. (For more info on the Houston-Brown marriage and divorce, click here.)
Many marriages follow the same path as Whitney Houston's to Bobby Brown, admittedly without the glitz, glam and paparazzi. Often during courtship you're swept off your feet by sweet beauty or suave gallantry. But once the honeymoon is over, the spouse you thought you knew starts to show a few cracks in the polish.
While learning to accept each other's foibles is part of marriage, there is no room for abuse. An abusive spouse crosses the line of "for better or worse" and morally negates the wedding vows. If you have an abusive spouse, do not risk your life another day. See a divorce attorney today.
Next time: Divorcing an Abusive Spouse.
Posted by Mike Mastracci on Friday, October 19, 2007 in Abuse Issues, High Profile Divorces | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
We are a litigious nation. "I'll sue you," is an often heard refrain. Certainly there is a necessary place for litigation, even in divorce cases. But what many divorcing couples fail to realize is that they can retain better control of their settlement and their expenses if they can come to agreement outside of court.
Anger, hurt and rejection drive the desire for revenge when parties divorce. Dramatic trials on television and in the movies make us think we can exact our pound of flesh in court. We envision our attorney standing up before a jury like Alan Shore (actor James Spader) on ABC's Boston Legal. All our fantasies will come true. We will be vindicated and our errant spouse vanquished!
Well, life just isn't like that. Most divorce and custody cases are heard and decided by a judge. Theatrics and melodrama don't play in most courtrooms. Your attorney presents your side, your spouse's attorney presents his/her side, and the judge decides. You cannot control the judge's decision which will be primarily based on the cold facts of the law. Often you receive a decision which, while correct under the law, may not feel morally right to the individuals whose lives have just been forever changed. For this privilege you pay. A family court trial is a lengthy and expensive process.
What couples caught up in the emotional turbulence of divorce fail to realize is that in most cases a trial judgment will not give them everything they want. Each party is likely to win on some issues and lose on others, and they will have no say in which is which. If a couple can set aside their animosity and come to agreement outside of court, they can maintain control of their settlement. Each party will still have to compromise. Neither individual will get everything they want, but each is much more likely to get the things that are truly important to them. If children are involved, an out-of-court settlement, is more likely to result in a custody arrangement that both parties can live with.
Collaborative family law developed to help couples come to divorce and custody agreements outside of court. The divorcing parties, rather than the court, maintain control over the settlement and custody decisions. Cooperation and compromise are necessary which may make this a difficult choice for some couples. But attorneys and a team of professionals dedicated to the collaborative process work with the couple to help them communicate effectively and respectfully as they resolve their issues.
So before you hire a trial attorney to take your divorce to court, ask yourself, "Am I willing to spend more money and seriously risk losing things that are important to me? If your answer is "no," you should give collaborative divorce serious consideration.
Posted by Mike Mastracci on Thursday, October 18, 2007 in Alternatives to Litigation, Collaborative Family Law | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
The sad and bizarre tale of Britney Spears' fall from grace hit a new low last week when the court awarded custody of their two children to father Kevin Federline. Blogs and websites went into overdrive speculating on whether the judge acted in the children's best interests, whether Federline will be a good dad, and whether Spears even wants her children.
No matter how you feel about Spears and Federline personally -- according to the entertainment press, both have had their problems with drugs, lifestyle choices and personal responsibility -- Spears' recent conduct deep-sixed her chances in court. After Spears repeated ignored Judge Scott Gordon's orders for drug tests, parenting classes and therapy, the judge awarded full-time custody of the couple's two children -- 2-year-old Sean Preston and 1-year-old Jayden James -- to Federline.
A divorced father, myself, I can't share the angst and agony being expressed on the internet about the children being taken from their mother. Federline may or may not turn out to be a good dad, but he has certainly exhibited more responsibility toward his children than Spears. Too often in divorce the abilities of fathers to successfully care for their children is overlooked in favor of the mother.
‘‘It is still the norm in the U.S. that women are expected to take care of the children as opposed to the male, who has far less responsibility in this area,’’ said Brown University sociologist Nancy Luke. ‘‘There is a definite double standard.’’
Despite society's expectation that mothers are naturally more nurturing and the best primary caregiver for their children, facts don't show that to be the case. For many parents, the contradiction between how they think they should feel about being parents and how they actually feel can create tremendous stress and lead to unfortunate decisions when they divorce and must determine custody arrangements for their children.
The sex of the parent should not be the deciding factor in awarding custody. I have met quite a few women who yearn to return to work after having a baby. Even though they enjoy their child, parenting makes them feel trapped, anxious and unfulfilled. I have also met a number of men who wish they could be with their child every minute of the day. They enjoy raising their children, taking care of a home, cooking, etc. The interest, ability and fitness of each parent, not his or her sex, should be the primary considerations used to determine custody arrangements. Ideally, both parents should be able to play major roles in raising their children.
In determining custody arrangements, parents need to be honest with themselves and each other. Collaborative family law allows parents to discuss these issues in an atmosphere of cooperation and respect. The collaborative process can lead to unique and creative solutions to custody issues that benefit both parents and particularly their children.
Posted by Mike Mastracci on Monday, October 15, 2007 in Child Access Issues, Child Support, Collaborative Family Law, High Profile Divorces | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Many people and some lawyers believe that collaboration and mediation are the same thing. Though there are similarities, each process is distinctly different and offers divorcing couples different options in separating their personal, family and financial relationships.
In our October 10, 2007 post, we defined collaboration and mediation as two distinct processes. Let’s look more closely at the main characteristics they share and how they are different.
How are collaboration and mediation the same?
How are collaboration and mediation different?
For more information on both collaborative divorce and mediation, click here to visit the Family Law section of Michael Mastracci’s website. In the left-hand column you'll find a number of topics that can answer your questions about divorce issues. If you are facing divorce, Mike Mastracci can assist you with collaboration, mediation or traditional litigation. Click here to contact Mike today.
Posted by Mike Mastracci on Friday, October 12, 2007 in Alternatives to Litigation, Collaborative Family Law, Mediation Issues | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Many people think mediation and collaborative divorce are the same thing. Some members of the legal community may even indicate there is not much difference between the two. While it is true that collaborative divorce practice has its roots in mediation, it is a distinctly different process.
What is mediation? In mediation, a neutral third party helps a couple define their areas of disagreement, then leads them to draw up a legally-binding agreement. The mediator directs and controls the meetings which generally involve only the mediator and two disputing parties. The mediator cannot provide legal advice or advocate for either side but parties may hire and consult their own attorneys between mediation sessions.
Sometimes a divorcing couple chooses mediation, other times mediation is ordered by the court and may be limited to a particular issue. Mediators receive special training and are regulated by each state. Agreements reached in mediation are legally binding and entered with the court. A mediator is forbidden to reveal what was discussed during mediation and cannot be called as a witness should the mediation process fail and the case go to court.
What is Collaboration? Collaboration is a team process in which both parties and their respective lawyers meet together in four-way meetings to cooperatively resolve divorce issues. Each attorney advises and supports their own client, but they may also speak to each other during the process. The couple work together to develop an equitable agreement that meets the needs of all parties, particularly the children.
Meetings rely on the voluntary and free exchange of information and emphasize respect, cooperation, honesty and professionalism. There is emphasis on developing positive communication skills as a basis for future contact. Additional advisers such as financial or child specialists may be hired jointly to advise all parties. There is no timeline and parties may meet as frequently and for as long as it takes to arrive at agreement.
Collaborative lawyers and team members receive specialized training and many subscribe to the ethics of the International Academy of Collaborative Professionals. In addition, collaborative lawyers must have practiced family law for a minimum of 5 years. Agreements reached through the collaborative process are registered with the court and become legally binding. Should the collaborative process fail, the attorneys and advisers are prohibited from representing either party in court.
Next time: Collaborative Divorce vs Mediation: What IS the Difference?
For more information on both collaborative divorce and mediation, click here to visit the Family Law section of Michael Mastracci’s website. In the left-hand column you'll find a number of topics that can answer your questions about divorce issues. If you are facing divorce, Mike Mastracci can assist you with collaboration, mediation or traditional litigation. Click here to contact Mike today.
Posted by Mike Mastracci on Wednesday, October 10, 2007 in Alternatives to Litigation, Collaborative Family Law, Mediation Issues | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Many divorcing couples are embracing collaborative divorce as a kinder, gentler method of dissolving their family and financial relationships (see our October 6 post). Increasingly the judiciary support collaborative divorce, and a growing number of state legislatures have voted to authorize collaborative divorce. The American Bar Association (ABA) recently came out with a opinion supporting collaborative divorce. However, as the October 5, 2007 article in the Baltimore Sun made clear, attorneys remain divided. (Click here to read the full article by reporter Melissa Harris).
The collaborative divorce agreement signed by the divorcing parties and their respective attorneys prevents the attorneys from representing their clients in court should the collaborative process fail. Collaborative divorce, which uses a cooperative meeting approach, can generally be resolved more quickly resulting in fewer billable hours and loss of income for attorneys. To be fair, America's adversarial approach to litigation has convinced many attorneys that this inability to represent their clients in court prohibits them from providing full and fair protection of their client's rights, a view struck down by the ABA's recently released opinion. Of course there are many attorneys who do not invest themselves in the welfare of their divorcing clients -- a tenet of collaborative divorce. They focus strictly on the law and using the law to achieve the greatest gain for their client, despite the cost to the family unit. Collaborative lawyers proactively represent their clients, but within the larger view of what will be best for the family, and particularly the children, now and into the future.
Siding with the adversarial view of divorce, the Colorado Bar Association struck down collaborative divorce as unethical, charging that it prohibited lawyers from aggressively fighting for their client's interests. "There's this fiction in collaborative law that everyone's always telling the truth," explained Harry Siegel, founder of the Maryland Trial Lawyers Association's Family Law Section. "If someone's lying, they could actually more successfully get away with it in a collaborative model than in the court system, where there are checks and balances."
Collaborative divorce is a new way of thinking about divorce law, "a complete paradigm shift" away from mainstream attorney practices, said Paul Washowshky, an Ellicott City attorney who accepts collaborative clients. Howard County Circuit Court Judge Diane Leasure shared the view of many in the Maryland judiciary when she called collaborative divorce "a wonderful option short of litigation." The Maryland judiciary now allows litigating couples to put their court action on hold to try the collaborative divorce process.
"The thing with domestic law is that there is so much discretion vested in a trial judge, especially when it comes to child custody and access issues," explained Judge Leasure. "We often only see the parties in court and don't meet the children ... so it's difficult to determine what's best for the children."
Collaborative law leaves the welfare of their children in the parents' hands and has led to some unique solutions, said collaborative attorney Jolie Weinberg. She has several clients where the custody agreement requires the parents, not the children, to move in and out of the family home. "The parents are truly the ones who are making the sacrifices for the kids," she said.
If you are considering collaborative divorce, it is important to work with an attorney dedicated to the collaborative process. Look for one who is a member of the International Association of Collaborative Professionals (IACP). Some attorneys consider that any cooperative effort, no matter how small or fleeting, constitutes collaborative practice. This simply isn't true. Collaborative lawyers take special training in the art of communication, positive listening and behavior management. They learn to think outside the box to develop creative solutions to a couple's issues. They are dedicated to helping both parties come to a fair and equitable agreement in an atmosphere of respect and safety outside of court. While effectively representing their clients, their focus is on helping the divorcing couple find solutions that will benefit the whole family, particularly the children.
Posted by Mike Mastracci on Monday, October 08, 2007 in Collaborative Family Law | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack (0)
Same split with a lot less spat was the humorous definition of collaborative divorce used to headline an excellent article that appeared yesterday in the October 5, 2007 issue of the Baltimore Sun. (Click here to read the full article by reporter Melissa Harris). Collaborative family law is making the news as more people search for ways to divorce without all the blood-letting and acrimony often typical of American divorce.
Collaborative divorce is a team approach in which the divorcing spouses, their respective attorneys and sometimes other professionals work together in an atmosphere of professionalism, calm and respect to dissolve the couple's family and financial relationships. The brainchild of a Minnesota attorney in 1990, collaborative divorce seeks to decrease the bitterness, length and cost of divorce in America.
Collaborative professionals -- attorneys, financial experts, divorce coaches, child specialists -- receive specialized training in the collaborative approach and contract to work toward the goal of a mutually acceptable settlement. Collaborative law is dedicated to solving legal issues outside the court system. Should the process break down and the couple decide to take their case to court, the collaborative team, particularly attorneys, is contractually bound to excuse themselves from the case.
Collaborative divorce is not the right fit for everyone. Both parties must be willing to put aside the hurt and anger that accompanies divorce and commit to resolving their differences fairly. Collaborative divorce is particularly effective when a divorce includes children. The collaborative process helps parents learn to communicate effectively and helps build the skills they will need to parent their children successfully but apart.
The Baltimore Sun article follows the divorce of Columbia, Maryland couple Frank and Stephanie Ellis. The Ellises were able to come to agreement about possessions, finances and child custody in four collaborative sessions at a cost of about $14,000, less than half the cost of a typical contested divorce. "The process felt like a business meeting," Stephanie said.
The skill of the collaborative team also helped the couple define and focus on the actual issues of their separation without getting bogged down in their emotions. Frank described a disagreement over how the couple would split a tax refund. "It got to the point where we both had sort of drawn lines in the sand and weren't going to bend. We took our attorneys and went into separate rooms and had venting sessions. ... It's amazing the things you choose to argue about." Once emotions were under control, the couple was able to reach an agreement.
The Ellises were successfully able to dissolve their marriage and settle child custody issues through the collaborative process. They have come out of the process with the ability to interact and communicate effectively and without acrimony. Their daughter, they say, is healthier and happier because of it.
Posted by Mike Mastracci on Saturday, October 06, 2007 in Alternatives to Litigation, Collaborative Family Law, Legal Articles | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Michael Mastracci, attorney and counselor at law, is your host and author of Divorce Without Dishonor® as well as the sponsor of the website www.MiketheLawyer.com.
You may have wondered just exactly who I am if you have been reading this blog. I thought that I would take just a few moments to introduce myself.
I am a native of Baltimore County and 43 years old. I graduated from the University of Baltimore Law School and was admitted to the Maryland State Bar in 1989. I began my legal career as a trial attorney handling personal injury and negligence cases. Through my in-depth trial experience, I developed a criminal defense practice for my firm.
My own difficult and acrimonious divorce and child custody battle led to my own personal interest in collaborative family law. I am the author of a soon to be released book on child custody issues and divorce survival using the collaborative family law model.
I am personable, a good listener, and sincerely interested in helping you to resolve your divorce and child custody issues in a fair and even-handed manner. My efforts are focused on improving the quality of your life while protecting the future emotional well-being of your children. I have personally felt and witnessed the strife that divorce causes in families and want to express my concern and compassion for your personal situation. Using collaborative law does not mean giving away your rights or just submitting to the will of a stronger-willed soon to be ex-spouse. Collaborative law entails working through the tough issues, brought on by divorce, as adults with a primary joint focus on helping your innocent children cope with the major adjustments that accompany separation and divorce.
I invite you to visit my website www.MiketheLawyer.com to learn more about me, my qualifications. and most importantly, how I can help YOU. Feel free to call me at 410-869-3400 and schedule an appointment or telephone consultation. I look forward to helping you through these difficult times.
Posted by Mike Mastracci on Thursday, October 04, 2007 in About Us | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Collaborative divorce is a way of solving disputes respectfully. However, given the reality of human nature, it may sometimes be difficult to maintain a cooperative atmosphere during meetings with your spouse and your respective attorneys. Here are some tips from collaborative experts that may help you as you move through the process of divorce.
If you and your spouse can work through the issues of your divorce together while maintaining an atmosphere of cooperation, you will both heal more quickly and be able to move forward with your separate lives. If you have children, divorce will be immensely less damaging if both parents are able to work together amicably.
For more information on collaborative divorce, see our blog posts beginning September 24, 2007 and click here to visit my website.
Posted by Mike Mastracci on Tuesday, October 02, 2007 in Collaborative Family Law | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack (0)
Divorce is so common that some couples stay married just to be different.
Posted by Mike Mastracci on Monday, October 01, 2007 in Quotes and Inspiration | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Collaborative divorce uses a cooperative team approach rather than an adversarial approach to arriving at an equitable divorce settlement. (See our blog posts beginning September 24, 2007.) The make-up of your collaborative team, which you and your spouse choose jointly at the onset, will depend on your individual circumstances. You and your spouse and your individual collaborative lawyers comprise the core of any team. Additional team members may include:
All members of your team should be collaborative professionals dedicated to working together to cooperatively resolve disputes. Each should be committed to the ethical guidelines set forth by the International Academy of Collaborative Professionals that prohibit team members from becoming involved in court proceedings connected to a case and demand with drawl should the collaborative process fail and the case move to court. The purpose of the collaborative team, after all, is to help you and your spouse resolve your issues cooperatively and develop a settlement agreement that meets both your needs without going to court.
The process generally starts when a divorcing couple contacts a collaborative family law practitioner, like myself, who can serve as a resource and conduit to other team members. Many collaborative professionals have agreements in place which makes it easy to form a team and get the process started quickly.
For more information on collaborative divorce and collaborative family law, click here to visit my website.
Posted by Mike Mastracci on Saturday, September 29, 2007 in Collaborative Family Law | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
In a collaborative divorce, your attorney is not neutral. He fully represents YOU, but with a change in emphasis and attitude. Instead of taking an adversarial approach, as is typical in most American divorces, lawyers who practice collaborative law emphasize mutual respect and cooperation. With collaborative divorce it is possible to arrive at an amicable settlement that respects the goals and needs of both parties.
As in any divorce proceeding, a lawyer who practices collaborative law serves as a resource, educator and advocate for his client. He performs the usual investigations and determinations, helps you organize disclosure documents and understand those provided by your spouse. He will apprise you of your legal rights and obligations and help you analyze the consequences of competing options and possible choices. But he will also try to anticipate conflict, work to achieve creative solutions to problems that are acceptable to both parties, and strive to manage the divorce process to promote cooperative resolution in a setting of mutual respect and dignified behavior.
You'll find that attorneys, like myself, who practice collaborative law make a real effort to get to know and understand our clients as individuals and develop a rapport with all of the parties involved in the divorce process. We value and practice respectful communication and listening skills and actively promote cooperative behavior. Collaborative divorce attorneys have a finely honed ability to identify the issues and concerns of both parties and bring the clarity of reason and reality to emotionally charged situations.
In collaborative divorce, court is not an option. If an settlement cannot be reached, the collaborative lawyers must withdraw, leaving the divorcing parties free to retain trial attorneys to pursue the matter in court. This ensures the commitment of the attorneys to reaching agreements and overcoming impasses through cooperative negotiation and mediation.
Much like court mediators, collaborative divorce lawyers are required to obtain special training. A collaborative divorce can save both parties the pain and anxiety of months spent haggling in court as well as the considerable expense generally incurred in an adversarial divorce. Through collaborative divorce, couples have the opportunity to emerge with a fair settlement and peaceable relationship while minimizing the negative effects of divorce on their children.
For more information on collaborative divorce and collaborative family law, click here to visit my website.
Next time: The collaborative divorce team.
Posted by Mike Mastracci on Wednesday, September 26, 2007 in Collaborative Family Law | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Browsing at the video store this weekend, The War of the Roses caught my eye. In the classic nasty divorce movie, divorce attorney Danny De Vito tells the story of an embittered couple, Michael Douglas and Kathleen Turner playing Oliver and Barbara Rose, who after 17 years of marriage decide to divorce. A pitched battle for possession of their luxurious home ensues, each party going to increasingly absurd (and comedic) lengths to outmaneuver the other -- to the ultimate downfall of both.
It struck me that, though exaggerated by Hollywood, this is the American view of divorce: two infuriated adults, angrily sniping at each other, each trying to get the upper hand and inflict damage, backed up by coldly calculating lawyers. This is the view reinforced repeatedly in movies, on television, on the pages of magazines and in books. In America divorce is acrimonious. Only one side will win. The other side must lose.
There was a time when I, too, held this view, until my own experience with divorce. The problem with considering divorce a battlefield is that it presupposes that there will be a winner and a loser, when the truth of the matter is that in divorce there are no winners; everyone loses, especially the children. In Collaborative Law I have found a way to help everyone in the family win, or at least not lose as much.
Collaborative law provides an opportunity for continued mutual respect between the divorcing parties, both through and after divorce. By working together -- collaborating -- collaborative divorce allows both parties to move on with their lives with dignity and peace. It is particularly effective when children are involved and parents must maintain a responsible relationship as they struggle to raise their children in two separate households.
In a collaborative divorce you and your spouse and your respective attorneys meet to jointly resolve issues. It is a non-litigation approach to divorce in which you are both committed to settling your differences and separating your lives without going to court. The emphasis in settlement meetings is on creating fair resolutions to differences in an open, safe, supportive environment. The goal is an agreement that will benefit both parties and their children. Those of us who practice collaborative family law believe collaborative divorce can become the new norm in America.
For more information on collaborative divorce and collaborative family law, click here to visit my website.
Next time: What is your attorney's role in a collaborative divorce?
Posted by Mike Mastracci on Monday, September 24, 2007 in Collaborative Family Law | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
There are times in everyone's life when they need the services of a good lawyer. An attorney who practices family law can be an important part of your family's support team. Just as your family doctor has a broad knowledge of medicine, a family lawyer has a broad knowledge of law. An attorney like myself who practices family law is capable of assisting you with the wide variety of legal issues that impact most people's lives.
You should always consult a lawyer when you:
Remember the old saying: He who is his own lawyer has a fool for a client. Contact me if you need a lawyer and consider signing up for prepaid legal services. It's an affordable way to make sure trustworthy legal advice is always at your fingertips.
Posted by Mike Mastracci on Friday, September 21, 2007 in Pre-Paid Legal Services | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
For the last week I've been talking in this space about identity theft. My own recent experience in preventing the potential identity theft of thousands of cancer patients at Johns Hopkins Hospital (see my September 8 post) brought home the importance of fighting this fast-growing crime. With more than 10 million victims every year, it is only a matter of time and luck before each of us personally experiences this devastating crime.
In the past week I've shared valuable information you can use to protect yourself from identity theft. While there are many positive steps you can take, there is, unfortunately, no way to totally protect yourself from becoming a victim of identity thieves. Each of us have sensitive personaI data stored on numerous computers across the country. Information about ourselves resides in computers or on data disks that contain medical records, utility information, government data, university alumni lists, bank accounts, consumer credit accounts, retirement plans, etc. Every week the news seems to carry a story about another presumably secure computer from an agency of public trust that has been hacked and the sensitive personal data it contains stolen by identity thieves. Every single one of us is at risk.
Identity theft is such an important issue with the potential to cause untold harm, both financially and emotionally, that I have expanded my family law practice to include an identity theft protection program. Click here to learn more about the Identity Theft Shield program and how you can be proactive in protecting yourself from identity theft.
Posted by Mike Mastracci on Wednesday, September 19, 2007 in Identity Theft | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)
Identity theft rob sits victims both financially and emotionally. The arduous task of repairing your financial records and credit for many is far more devastating than the loss of money. The fastest growing crime in America, we've been talking about identity theft lately (see our previous posts starting with September 8).
If, despite every precaution, you become the luckless victim of identity thieves, there are steps you can take to minimize the damage. As you are working to restore your identity and credit, make sure you keep all correspondence and make a detailed record of all your conversations, including date, who you talked to and a summary of what was said. The longer you wait to act, the more damage identity thieves can do and the more costly it will be to you, so take immediate action.
Report the theft to the police immediately and request that a theft report be filed.
Place a fraud alert on your credit reports and review your current credit reports.
Close accounts you know or suspect have been tampered with or opened fraudulently.
File a complaint with the Federal Trade Commission.
Posted by Mike Mastracci on Monday, September 17, 2007 in Identity Theft | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Identity theft is on the fast track to overtake drugs as the most prolific crime in America. With 10 million people falling victim every year, there's a better than average chance that you or someone you know will fall prey to identity thieves. To minimize your risk, the U.S. Department of Justice says, remember the word SCAM:
Stingy is what you need to be about giving out personal information to others. Adopt a need to know approach to your personal data. Be suspicious first, so you won't be sorry later.
Check your financial information regularly. Pay attention to what you receive and don't receive. Failure to receive information can indicate that someone has fraudulently diverted your mail to another address.
Check each transaction in your monthly bank and credit card statements carefully. If you find an unauthorized debit, charge or withdrawal, report it to the financial institution immediately and request that they take action.
Ask for a copy of your credit report every year. It should list all bank and financial accounts under your name and will tell you if anyone has fraudulently opened or used any accounts in your name. Click here to request a free annual credit report.
Maintain careful records of your banking and financial accounts, including credit card accounts. Retain checks and monthly statements for a minimum of one year. If a transaction or your signature is disputed, your original records will be immediately accessible and more useful than bank copies.
For more information on identity theft, read our previous posts in this series starting on September 8.
Next time: What to do if your identity is stolen.
Posted by Mike Mastracci on Friday, September 14, 2007 in Identity Theft | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Victims of identity theft suffer not only financial loss but tremendous psychological pain and a feeling of violation. They may be harassed by debt collectors and have to cope with serious banking problems, loan rejection or utility cutoffs. They may even face arrest for crimes committed by the person who stole their identity.
With passage of the Identity Theft Assumption and Deterrence Act in 1998, identity theft became a crime in America. Federal and state laws often protect victims against financial loss but it is the severe disruption to their lives and the emotional damage that cause victims the most distress. On average, victims spend 600 hours trying to clear financial problems and repair damaged credit. In a recent poll, Americans feared only a terrorist act on the level of 9/11 more than the theft of their personal data.
Portrait of a victim. The average identity theft victim is 42 and lives in a large metropolitan area. Eighty-six percent of victims have no relation to the thief. Unfortunately, most victims do not notice the crime for 14 months, plenty of time for the thief to wreak havoc with their finances, credit score and community standing. The longer it takes to discover the theft, the greater the victim's loss and suffering.
Scene of the crime. Using your identity, thieves can authorize electronic transfers and clean out your bank account, open credit cards in your name and run up huge debts, open a bank account and write bad checks, take out an auto loan and buy a car, get ID such as a drivers license issued in your name but with their picture, get a job using your name, file fraudulent tax returns, even commit crimes using their victim's name. Thieves often change the mailing address on accounts so you don't even know what's happening until the bill collectors and police arrive at your door.
Take a look at these actual cases of identity theft prosecuted by the U.S. Department of Justice:
Next time: How to protect yourself from identity theft.
Posted by Mike Mastracci on Wednesday, September 12, 2007 in Identity Theft | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Recent Comments